In project one I studied the sensory experiences of walking
and texting. Through this research I recorded first hand responses of the
sensory reactions of relying on peripheral vision to navigate obstacles.
Participants in the research all accounted an underlying factor of the
experience; relying on your peripherals was harder than expected. My experiment
was to record the actions of a participant jay-walking whilst texting on
his/her phone with earplugs in. The mood I was attempting to create was one of
rebellion.
I experimented with these social conventions in relation to
the sensory experience of walking and texting. By breaking these social
conventions of order and structure the participant was in turn rebelling
against them. The social norms for crossing a street are of course to engage
all senses into safely crossing a street, looking both ways, waiting for
traffic to pass etc. But when these
sensory experiences are taken away or distracted the emotional and sensory
experience is completely changed. In terms of sensory awareness I created the
feeling of rebellion by taking away the participants sense of hearing and
sight. Relying only on peripherals the participant was rebelling against social
conventions and norms. Although dangerous and avoidable the emotional
experience of being vulnerable and completely distracted was a rebellious
sensory experience. A recent analysis of texting and walking described their
participants saying “distracted individuals (were) unable to detect safe opportunities for action” (Hyman, 2009) this explains the sensory feeling of vulnerability; the inability to detect danger is an exact rebellion of our social and natural responses.
Even the act of walking and texting
is fast becoming a breach in social convention, in 2011 the reported cases of
accidents due to patients walking and texted was over one thousand, which was
double 2010’s results (DailyDealMedia, 2012). Even after these incidents
pedestrians still insist on distracting their senses and rebelling against
social conventions. Whilst a person is walking in the social norm of engaging
all their senses to walk in a straight line, a recent study concluded that “
; mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;">the mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;"> dual-task of walking while using a cell phone impacts executive
function and working memory” (Lamberg, 2011) this means that the sensory and
emotional experience of walking and texting is as much a cognitive experience
as it is a physical. By experimenting with participants senses, by either
taking them away or occluding them, their emotional and sensory calibration is
altered. Furthermore, by putting them in a situation that exceeds their social,
physical and biological conventions they are in turn rebelling against these
conventions and also their senses.
The video below is of the participant crossing the street with his sense impaired. More so his hearing is cut off by music/earplugs, his sight is restricted to peripherals due to texting off his cell phone. It shows how dangerous and deluded our senses can make us when we rebel against social constructs and safety above all else.
For my second experiment I wanted to look at how I could make walking and texting glamorous. I had my participant stand in places that have aesthetic value of glamour, expensive items such as suits and perfume are all part of the construct of "glamour". By simply surrounding yourself with glamorous objects you in turn become glamorous as glamour is about vanity, wealth and materialism. This experiment actually had an effect on the participant, making him more aware of his surroundings. The speed at which he walked and texted decreased hugely. Cautious not to hit anything he simply walked slowly and immersed himself in his surroundings. Perhaps this is a result of the objects around him? The objects influence on society changed the way he viewed his surroundings. He noted that although the act of walking and texting did not become glamorous emotional and sensory experiences were heightened to the point of glamour. The smell of perfume around him made him feel as though he was as important as the images that relate to the perfumes and suits that surrounded him.
The senses effected were of course sight, the surroundings could only be seen through peripherals but sense such as smell were effected positively. The smell of perfumes and leather could be smelt while he walked slowly around texting.
Surrounded by suits, very glamorous |
Engaging only smell |
Participant smelling the sweet smell of chanel |
For my third and final experiment I was looking at comfort. I constructed a pair of glasses that had mirrors attached to them. They were angled back so the person wearing them could see his peripherals in greater detail without having to look up at all. The notion that safety is comfort was utilized in the creation of this experiment. By changing the sight sense component to the activity of walking and texting the participants sight was aided. The participants could still walk and text at the same time but with comfort as he/she could see more than they would have had they not have been wearing the glasses. Not being able to see more than your peripherals is the main reason walking and texting is so dangerous and awkward, but by changing the senses so they can better navigate the person experience of walking and texting becomes more comfortable. This experiment was successful because it succeeded in making the experience more comfortable. Sensory experiences were changed to achieve this result.
Below are some images of the glasses that were created and an attempt to show how they would work if wearing them.
This is one of the angles of sight with the glasses on |
This is what the glasses look like on their own |
Another showing the angle of reflection |
Being able to visually see your surroundings clearer when they should be negatively effected by the activity of walking and texting is a successful attempt at creating the mood of comfort. By altering sight the participant said that his emotional experience was more comfortable. Before wearing the glasses he said he felt vulnerable and unsafe as his peripherals were not enough to see oncoming obstacles as he made his way down the street. But once he was wearing the glasses he could see more than what his peripherals would have been able to show him before. The effect of this on his senses was one of comfort.
No comments:
Post a Comment